19/05/2014

How are you?

It is quite common to find in ethnographic readings on indigenous peoples how they establish links close with their environment or territory. In issue 34 of the AETG (Spanish Association of Gestalt Therapy) magazine, dedicated to the Mother, there is an article by anthropologist Peter Rawitscher from Berkeley describing the relationship of the people of Sierra Nueva, in Colombia, with their territory and environment.

For these peoples —Kogi, Arhuaco, Wiwa and Kankuamo— territory and environment is the Mother, they work to heal and care for Mother —Nature— and, simultaneously, the human body is the same material and spiritual body of the territory. Thus, land management and well being of the body are part of the same spiritual order. Every action, thought and emotion of the person affects the territory, and, conversely, any characteristic of the territory affects the person.

At one point, he says that at a meeting of the Wiwa was discussed what to do with neighboring peasants that were fishing and carrying out illegal mining activities in the rivers, threatening both the indigenous territory and communities. While some indigenous proposed a denounce, the shaman said, and I quote: ‘We are responsible. We are attracting the problem, thinking evil among ourselves, without respecting the law of origin. We are affecting the Mother, and She is taking us in the form of theft of our territory. We must confess and clean this’. According to the author, they decided to make some personal healing work following the shaman’s instructions and achieved to disappear external problem generated by neighboring farmers.

W_howareyou
Inhabitants of Vanuatu, near New Guinea —Photo Jimmy Nelson

This type of look, which shares a common sense of the experience of being affected and be affecting an environment —including people—, a look of care and respect, contrasts sharply with the western look. I do not want to fall into the myth of the noble savage and superstitions that accompany about living closer to nature —a way of saying they live closer than instinctive—, living better with little and be happier than us. Maybe in some ways yes, in others no. Maybe the weight of the group can sometimes be overwhelming for people who compose this type of societies.

Many years ago I was told, and I hope not an urban legend, that the American —I do not know which one concretely— were posed how their decisions could potentially affect the seventh generation of descendants. In our Western societies, where what it prevails and exalts is the individual and the immediate, we are at the other pole, engrossed in ourselves, lost in what happens to me in particular. Lost also mentally, explaining it all in a logical and rational way, running away from any situation that sounds or smells emotional. We are also lost in the game of appear, creating an unquestionable and unwavering picture of me: from the obsession with our physical presence —a monotheistic conception of beauty—, giving the impression that we have everything under control or that things are going very well. What matters is what happens to me, what matters is success. We not see or look beyond our navels.

Often strikes me how little we ask each other how we are, not to look good, but with a real interest in the other. It seems the other exists just to compare us with him, or to solve the own needs. Ironically we feel very alone and one of the diseases most diagnosed is depression.

We Westerners might regain some of that group sense, careful and respectful, and consider how our attitudes, decisions and individual actions affect others and ourselves. Also in our environment. The paradox is that to begin to see the other, we must begin to look at our inside. Although with different eyes.

Related posts
899
105
array(2) { [0]=> int(899) [1]=> int(105) }
array(4) { [0]=> object(WP_Post)#1639 (24) { ["ID"]=> int(1512) ["post_author"]=> string(4) "2049" ["post_date"]=> string(19) "2012-05-28 00:02:48" ["post_date_gmt"]=> string(19) "2012-05-27 22:02:48" ["post_content"]=> string(1447) "Neil deGrasse Tyson es un astrofísico y divulgador científico estadounidense. Actualmente es también director del Planetario Hayden en el Centro Rose para la Tierra y el Espacio e investigador asociado en el Departamento de Astrofísica del Museo Americano de Historia Natural. Desde el año 2006 es el presentador del programa de televisión de corte educativo-científico NOVA scienceNOW en el canal PBS, y su nombre suena con fuerza para conducir la secuela de la serie de televisión 'Cosmos: un viaje personal', co-creada y presentada originalmente por Carl Sagan. Un redactor de la revista Time le preguntó cuál era el hecho más asombroso que había encontrado en su estudio del Universo, y en este vídeo podemos ver su respuesta.Neil deGrasse Tyson is an American astrophysicist and science writer. Today is also the director of the Hayden Planetarium in the Rose Center for Earth and Space and a research associate in the Department of Astrophysics at the American Museum of Natural History. Since 2006 is the host of educational and scientific television program NOVA scienceNOW on PBS, and his name sounds hard to drive the sequel to the television series 'Cosmos: a personal journey', co-created and originally filed by Carl Sagan. An editor of Time magazine asked him what was the most amazing fact that he had found in his study of the universe, and in this video we see his response." ["post_title"]=> string(118) "Lo más asombroso de todo el UniversoThe most outstanding fact across the Universe" ["post_excerpt"]=> string(0) "" ["post_status"]=> string(7) "publish" ["comment_status"]=> string(4) "open" ["ping_status"]=> string(4) "open" ["post_password"]=> string(0) "" ["post_name"]=> string(41) "the-most-outstanding-fact-in-the-universe" ["to_ping"]=> string(0) "" ["pinged"]=> string(0) "" ["post_modified"]=> string(19) "2021-06-13 14:34:37" ["post_modified_gmt"]=> string(19) "2021-06-13 12:34:37" ["post_content_filtered"]=> string(0) "" ["post_parent"]=> int(0) ["guid"]=> string(29) "http://whatonline.org/?p=1512" ["menu_order"]=> int(0) ["post_type"]=> string(4) "post" ["post_mime_type"]=> string(0) "" ["comment_count"]=> string(1) "2" ["filter"]=> string(3) "raw" } [1]=> object(WP_Post)#1637 (24) { ["ID"]=> int(5480) ["post_author"]=> string(4) "2049" ["post_date"]=> string(19) "2013-12-23 00:01:12" ["post_date_gmt"]=> string(19) "2013-12-22 23:01:12" ["post_content"]=> string(1621) "Tres grandes de la divulgación científica, cada uno experto en una temática diferente, se reunieron por primera y única vez en un mismo plató de televisión en el año 1988. Stephen Hawking, Carl Sagan y Arthur C. Clarke hablaron sobre la gran teoría unificada de las leyes que gobiernan el Universo. Este singular documento, aunque anterior a descubrimientos hoy conocidos como la existencia de la energía oscura, aborda temas como la Teoría del Big Bang, la expansión del Universo, los agujeros negros, la vida extraterrestre, la existencia de Dios y los orígenes de la creatividad.Three major of the scientific outreach, each an expert in a different field, met for the first and unique time in the same television studio in 1988. Stephen Hawking, Carl Sagan and Arthur C. Clarke spoke of the grand unified theory of the laws that govern the Universe. This unusual document, although it's before today's known discoveries such as the existence of dark energy, addresses issues such as the Big Bang Theory, the expansion of the Universe, black holes, extraterrestrial life, the existence of God and the origins of creativity." ["post_title"]=> string(107) "Dios, el Universo y todo lo demásGod, the Universe and everything else" ["post_excerpt"]=> string(0) "" ["post_status"]=> string(7) "publish" ["comment_status"]=> string(4) "open" ["ping_status"]=> string(4) "open" ["post_password"]=> string(0) "" ["post_name"]=> string(36) "god-the-universe-and-everything-else" ["to_ping"]=> string(0) "" ["pinged"]=> string(0) "" ["post_modified"]=> string(19) "2020-06-13 02:53:04" ["post_modified_gmt"]=> string(19) "2020-06-13 00:53:04" ["post_content_filtered"]=> string(0) "" ["post_parent"]=> int(0) ["guid"]=> string(29) "http://whatonline.org/?p=5480" ["menu_order"]=> int(0) ["post_type"]=> string(4) "post" ["post_mime_type"]=> string(0) "" ["comment_count"]=> string(1) "0" ["filter"]=> string(3) "raw" } [2]=> object(WP_Post)#1641 (24) { ["ID"]=> int(2979) ["post_author"]=> string(4) "2049" ["post_date"]=> string(19) "2012-07-09 00:04:33" ["post_date_gmt"]=> string(19) "2012-07-08 22:04:33" ["post_content"]=> string(2081) "En tan sólo unos decenios, el hombre ha roto el equilibrio de miles de años de evolución de la Tierra y ha puesto en peligro su futuro. El riesgo es enorme y la Humanidad tiene que concienciarse de la explotación desmesurada de las riquezas del planeta y cambiar sus hábitos de consumo. Este es el argumento que llevó al fotógrafo francés Yann Arthus-Bertrand a embarcarse en tres años de trabajo para rodar el documental 'Home' (Hogar). Realizado a base de imágenes aéreas tomadas en más de 50 países, la intención del autor fue 'colocar el primer ladrillo del edificio que todos nosotros debemos reconstruir conjuntamente', según sus propias palabras. La película es gratuita y se estrenó simultáneamente en salas de cine y en Internet en junio de 2009. Actualmente está preparando una secuela, 'Home, historia de un viaje', en la que insiste sobre las heridas del planeta y explica las razones que le han llevado a volver a abordar el mismo tema.In just a few decades, man has disrupted the balance of thousands of years of the Earth's evolution of and has jeopardized his future. The risk is enormous and Humanity must become aware of the excessive exploitation of the planet's wealth and change their consumption habits. This is the argument that led to the French photographer Yann Arthus-Bertrand to embark on three years of work to shoot the documentary 'Home'. Made of aerial images taken in more than 50 countries, the author's intention was 'to place the first brick of the building that we must rebuild all together', in his own words. The film is free and was released simultaneously in theaters and on the Internet in June 2009. Currently he is working on a sequel, 'Home, story of a journey', which insists on the wounds of the world and explains the reasons that led him to get back on the same subject. " ["post_title"]=> string(70) "Hogar, dulce hogarHome, sweet home" ["post_excerpt"]=> string(0) "" ["post_status"]=> string(7) "publish" ["comment_status"]=> string(4) "open" ["ping_status"]=> string(4) "open" ["post_password"]=> string(0) "" ["post_name"]=> string(15) "home-sweet-home" ["to_ping"]=> string(0) "" ["pinged"]=> string(0) "" ["post_modified"]=> string(19) "2021-05-08 23:49:17" ["post_modified_gmt"]=> string(19) "2021-05-08 21:49:17" ["post_content_filtered"]=> string(0) "" ["post_parent"]=> int(0) ["guid"]=> string(29) "http://whatonline.org/?p=2979" ["menu_order"]=> int(0) ["post_type"]=> string(4) "post" ["post_mime_type"]=> string(0) "" ["comment_count"]=> string(1) "0" ["filter"]=> string(3) "raw" } [3]=> object(WP_Post)#1808 (24) { ["ID"]=> int(2877) ["post_author"]=> string(4) "2049" ["post_date"]=> string(19) "2012-07-02 00:02:47" ["post_date_gmt"]=> string(19) "2012-07-01 22:02:47" ["post_content"]=> string(1925) "Muchos científicos, entre ellos el físico y cosmólogo británico Stephen Hawking y el ya fallecido astrónomo y astrofísico estadounidense Carl Sagan, llevan largo tiempo advirtiendo de que será muy difícil evitar un desastre en la Tierra en los próximos siglos o incluso años, de modo que es muy posible que el futuro de la raza humana deba transcurrir en algún lugar del espacio. Hawking piensa que la Humanidad 'no debería poner todos los huevos en la misma cesta o en el mismo planeta' y apoya sin vacilación la investigación seria de la vida fuera del nuestro, mientras que Sagan sostenía que los humanos terminarán sin duda por conquistar otros lugares para vivir que ahora no podemos ni siquiera imaginar, aunque también que esos humanos serán muy diferentes a nosotros. En este vídeo lo explica con sus propias palabras.Many scientists, including British physicist and cosmologist Stephen Hawking and the late American astronomer and astrophysicist Carl Sagan, have long been warning that it will be very difficult to avoid a disaster on Earth in the coming centuries or even years, so it is quite possible that the future of the human race must pass somewhere in the space. Hawking thinks humanity 'should not put all your eggs in one basket, or on the same planet' and without hesitation supports serious research of life outside of our own, while Sagan argued that humans will eventually —doubtless— conquer elsewhere to live that we can not even imagine now, but also that those humans are very different from us. In this video he explains it in his own words." ["post_title"]=> string(99) "¿Viviremos siempre en la Tierra?Will we live forever on Earth?" ["post_excerpt"]=> string(0) "" ["post_status"]=> string(7) "publish" ["comment_status"]=> string(4) "open" ["ping_status"]=> string(4) "open" ["post_password"]=> string(0) "" ["post_name"]=> string(29) "will-we-live-forever-on-earth" ["to_ping"]=> string(0) "" ["pinged"]=> string(0) "" ["post_modified"]=> string(19) "2020-03-09 16:43:58" ["post_modified_gmt"]=> string(19) "2020-03-09 15:43:58" ["post_content_filtered"]=> string(0) "" ["post_parent"]=> int(0) ["guid"]=> string(29) "http://whatonline.org/?p=2877" ["menu_order"]=> int(0) ["post_type"]=> string(4) "post" ["post_mime_type"]=> string(0) "" ["comment_count"]=> string(1) "0" ["filter"]=> string(3) "raw" } }